9/11 Review



Web Site:
 Home Page
 Site Navigation
 Sign Up
 What's New

Top Topics:


 More topics...








At 5:22 p.m. on September 11th 2001, the 47 story building number 7 of the World Trade Center Plaza came down in slightly over 8 seconds. The building had not been hit by any plane, nor sustained any significant damage from the "collapse" of the Twin Towers seven hours earlier, nor was there any major fire in the building at the time. The video clearly show that it was brought down as result of a synchronized demolition.

[WWW]A video of the collapse of Building 7 ([WWW]Local Copy) of the World Trade Center shows the perfect controlled demolition of WTC 7 ([WWW]Local Animated Gif). WTC 7 was 2 blocks away from WTC1/2, and was only superficially hit by debris when 1 and 2 collapsed as you can readily see from the starting point of the video. At 5:22 p.m., over six hours after WTC 1 and 2 "collapsed", WTC 7 came down in a free fall.

The Official Story in the press is that diesel fuel reservoirs for backup power generators at Guilliani's Emergency Command Center in the building exploded and brought the resulting fire brought the building down, even though there has never been a case [WWW]on record of fire-induced collapse of large fire-protected steel buildings, and that there were only [WWW]very small fires in progress when the building "collapsed." Not to mention that, as any one with the slightest technical background knows, diesel at normal pressure is non-explosive and barely flammable. (!) See our pages MuslimsSuspendPhysics.

According to the House so-called [WWW]investigation:

Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analysis are needed to resolve this issue.

In other words: no reason.

The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one. The investigation continues of WTC 1 and 2 (there's lots of interest), but the observation that there has never been a fire-induced collapse of large fire-protected steel building holds true for them too. If you could melt fire-protected hardened steel with kerosene, someone should tell the steel companies!

(!) See our page Guardian.


                     [WWW]hereisnewyork 7794 [WWW]hereisnewyork 7795 [WWW]hereisnewyork 7796 [WWW]hereisnewyork 7797 [WWW]hereisnewyork 2460 [WWW]hereisnewyork 3073 [WWW]hereisnewyork 6060


                     [WWW]Chapter 5 - WTC Seven - The WTC Report. ([WWW]Local Copy)

                     [WWW]The WTC Collapse: What the Videos Show

                     [WWW]WTC 7 was DEMOLISHED

                     [WWW]WTC-7: The Improbable Collapse

                     [WWW]Killtown's: Was the collapse of WTC 7 a controlled demolition?

                     [WWW]The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism

                     [WWW]Brad M's WTC 7 Page

                     [WWW]Elite Watch 7WTC ([WWW]Local Copy)

                     [WWW]World Premiere: Brandnew Footage of WTC 7

                     See the point-by-point analysis in the 911Encyclopedia topic: [Sept11Wiki]Collapse,Building7 .

Translate this page into: English, French.
Or try one of these actions: LocalSiteMap, of this page (last modified 2004-01-01 03:06:34)